Card image cap

George Barker's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

100%
2020
100%
2019
100%
2018-2019
100%
2018-2019
100%
2018
88%
2016-2017
75%
2016
100%
2015
100%
2014-2015
100%
2014-2015
100%
2014
100%
2012
100%
2010
100%
2009
100
2008
21%
2011-2012
26%
2018
77%
2019
77%
2019
77%
2018
77%
2018
74%
2017
74%
2017
72%
2017
72%
2017
69%
2016
69%
2016
81%
2015
81%
2015
88%
2014-2015
88%
2014-2015
81%
2014
81%
2014
100%
2013
100%
2013
79%
2013
79%
2013
64%
2012
64%
2012
90%
2012
90%
2012
62%
2012
62%
2012
77%
2012
77%
2012
63%
2012
63%
2012
60
2010
60
2010
56
2010
56
2010
64%
2010
64%
2010
54
2010
54
2010
68
2009
68
2009
54
2009
54
2009
82%
2009
82%
2009
50
2009
50
2009
56
2008
56
2008
100%
2017
100%
2017
60%
2016
75%
2013
100%
2012
100%
2012
86%
2021
91%
2022
83%
2021
71%
2021
90%
2019
90%
2019
89%
2018
73%
2017
81%
2017
75%
2016
90%
2015-2019
90%
2015-2019
100%
2015
83%
2014-2018
83%
2014-2018
3%
2020
26%
2018-2019
16%
2016-2017
11%
2014-2015
21%
2013
6%
2010-2011
18%
2008-2009
100%
2019
100%
2019
100%
2018
100%
2018
94%
2018
94%
2018
100%
2017
100%
2017
93%
2017
93%
2017
100%
2016
100%
2016
92%
2016
92%
2016
93%
2015
93%
2015
100%
2015
100%
2015
100%
2014
100%
2014
95%
2014
95%
2014
100%
2012
100%
2012
90%
2012
90%
2012
100%
2010
100%
2010
100%
2010
100%
2010
100%
2009
100%
2009
100
2008
100
2008
98%
2020
98%
2020
99%
2019
99%
2019
100%
2017
100%
2017
60%
2016
75%
2013
100%
2012
100%
2012
10%
2020-2021
3%
2020
3%
2020
26%
2018-2019
26%
2018-2019
16%
2016-2017
16%
2016-2017
11%
2014-2015
11%
2014-2015
21%
2013
21%
2013
6%
2010-2011
6%
2010-2011
18%
2008-2009
18%
2008-2009
26%
2019
32%
2019
26%
2019
24%
2018
24%
2018
28%
2018
28%
2018
29%
2017
24%
2017
29%
2017
24%
2017
10%
2016
23%
2016
10%
2016
23%
2016
50%
2015
50%
2015
20%
2014
20%
2014
10%
2013
10%
2013
11%
2012-2017
11%
2012-2017
26%
2012
26%
2012
0%
2004-2014
0%
2004-2014
arrow_upward